The Anticipation Savings: Sections 29 to 34
Which earlier disclosures do not count as anticipation of an invention in India?
Latest update: . Case: Agriboard International LLC v Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs. Doctrine: 'Made Available to the Public'.
Does using or publishing an invention after filing a provisional specification destroy its novelty?
Under section 33, use and publication of the invention made after the priority date will not amount to anticipation.
Doctrine last updated on 18 October 2026
Use and Publication After Provisional Specification, Ali on Patents, www.aop.onl/post-provisional-use
1Section 33 protects the use of an invention in India or the publication of that invention anywhere in the world made after the date of filing of the provisional specification. Such use or publication will not become a part of the state of the art and hence cannot be relied upon for the purpose of anticipation. The Controller shall not refuse to grant a patent or revoke or invalidate a granted patent on the ground that the matter disclosed in a provisional specification was used in India or published in India or elsewhere after filing such provisional specification. The section also provides for an identical protection for use and publication made after the date of application for protection in the case of a convention application. In effect, use and publication of the invention made after the priority date will not amount to anticipation.
Which earlier disclosures do not count as anticipation of an invention in India?
What is the difference between a provisional and a complete patent specification in India?
How is the priority date of a claim in an Indian patent application determined?
Doctrine page · Written by Prof. Feroz Ali
www.aop.onl/post-provisional-use